Mexican Twitter User Sparks Debate on U.S. Intervention in Venezuela – Standing Firm Amid Criticism
Quality Content (English, Human Tone)
On January 3, 2026, Santi (@santimking) from Mexico posted a controversial tweet defending his stance against U.S. intervention in Venezuela. He wrote:
“Nunca tuve intención de tener visa gringa señor @ChrisLandauUSA, apuradamente tengo INE y está vencido.”
This response came after former U.S. Ambassador to Mexico, Christopher Landau (@ChrisLandauUSA), seemingly referenced visas in the ongoing discussion sparked by Santi’s earlier tweet condemning the U.S. bombing of Venezuelan military targets under Nicolás Maduro. Santi argued that civilian casualties are unavoidable in such military actions, emphasizing the human cost often ignored by policymakers.
Nunca tuve intención de tener visa gringa señor @ChrisLandauUSA, apuradamente tengo INE y está vencido.
— Santi (@santimking) January 3, 2026
The discussion quickly polarized Twitter audiences. Supporters hailed Santi for highlighting the humanitarian consequences of U.S. imperialism, stressing that Latin American countries have historically suffered from foreign interventions. Critics, however, accused him of hypocrisy and defended the strike as a necessary measure to dismantle Maduro’s dictatorship.
Fact & Context:
The original bombing, reportedly targeting only military zones, led to celebrations among some Venezuelans, reflecting deep divisions in public perception. Santi’s clarification about his lack of interest in a U.S. visa and expired INE (Mexican voter ID) sought to remove any perception of personal gain while maintaining his moral stance.
Opinion & Future Expectations:
While Santi’s comments are bound to trigger controversy, they also spotlight a broader debate about sovereignty, foreign intervention, and Latin America’s historical struggles. If these discussions persist, policymakers may face increased scrutiny from international observers and citizens alike, demanding greater accountability for military operations abroad.
0 comments